RG-30.228, LAPSI, special business meeting, May 21, 1964 | NCP-LA
RG-30.228, LAPSI, special business meeting, May 21, 1964.pdf (PDF Document, 2.01 MB)
Download Original File
Request hi-res copy
Title:
RG-30.228, LAPSI, special business meeting, May 21, 1964
Date:
May 21, 1964
ID:
RG-30.228
Repository:
NCP-LA
Found in:
History of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, 1950-1999
Item 227: RG-30.228, LAPSI, special business meeting, May 21, 1964, May 21, 1964
Item 227: RG-30.228, LAPSI, special business meeting, May 21, 1964, May 21, 1964Creators:
Subjects:
Analysts have not made our goals sufficiently clear by precept and example, Sarlin
Dr. Ekstein, Psychoanalysis is not and need not be concerned with a public image, 1964
Dr. Ekstein, Psychoanalytic pioneers were not concerned because it was the cause that was important
Dr. Ekstein, We become concerned with image when we are unsure of ourselves
Dr. Gitelson, Psychoanalysis is more a science than is psychiatry itself, discourse
Dr. Gitelson, Psychoanalytic training is not a vocational course, guaranteeing full employment, 1964
Dr. Greenson, after the war there are less symptoms of neuroses and more of character disorders
Dr. Heyman, it is easy to improvement with psychoanalysis, but difficult to get a cure
Dr. Lawrence Friedman, psychoanalysis is a science and psychotherapy is a branch of medicine, 1964
Dr. Lawrence Friedman candidates hope that analysis improve their capacity for therapy and it is not
Dr. Rangel, after the war psychoanalysis had a heyday and now there is a swing back, discourse
Dr. Rosow, Secrecy, insularity, skepticism lack of cohesiveness, etc. are the issues, discourse
Dr. Sarlin, Analytic credo, discourse
Dr. Sarlin, Psychoanalysis suggests that we try to understand human affairs before passing judgement
It is possible to disagree without becoming disagreeable, Lyndon B. Johnson, discourse
LAPSI, discursive history of the organization
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Lawrence Friedman, it is a difference between training analysis and therapeutic analysis
Los Angeles psychoanalytic society, special business meeting, May 21, 1964
Los Angeles psychoanalytic society, special business meetings
Many of the members have a very parochial view of the problem and have regarded it as a national one
Opposition is not enmity but is frequently misused to make an opening for, Sigmund Freud, discourse
Report of the Committee on the Study of Psychoanalytic practice, May 21, 1964
Sometimes the struggle against identification is justifiable, Sarlin
When fear is appropriate and is no indication of the successful completion of analysis, Sarlin
Dr. Ekstein, Psychoanalysis is not and need not be concerned with a public image, 1964
Dr. Ekstein, Psychoanalytic pioneers were not concerned because it was the cause that was important
Dr. Ekstein, We become concerned with image when we are unsure of ourselves
Dr. Gitelson, Psychoanalysis is more a science than is psychiatry itself, discourse
Dr. Gitelson, Psychoanalytic training is not a vocational course, guaranteeing full employment, 1964
Dr. Greenson, after the war there are less symptoms of neuroses and more of character disorders
Dr. Heyman, it is easy to improvement with psychoanalysis, but difficult to get a cure
Dr. Lawrence Friedman, psychoanalysis is a science and psychotherapy is a branch of medicine, 1964
Dr. Lawrence Friedman candidates hope that analysis improve their capacity for therapy and it is not
Dr. Rangel, after the war psychoanalysis had a heyday and now there is a swing back, discourse
Dr. Rosow, Secrecy, insularity, skepticism lack of cohesiveness, etc. are the issues, discourse
Dr. Sarlin, Analytic credo, discourse
Dr. Sarlin, Psychoanalysis suggests that we try to understand human affairs before passing judgement
It is possible to disagree without becoming disagreeable, Lyndon B. Johnson, discourse
LAPSI, discursive history of the organization
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Lawrence Friedman, it is a difference between training analysis and therapeutic analysis
Los Angeles psychoanalytic society, special business meeting, May 21, 1964
Los Angeles psychoanalytic society, special business meetings
Many of the members have a very parochial view of the problem and have regarded it as a national one
Opposition is not enmity but is frequently misused to make an opening for, Sigmund Freud, discourse
Report of the Committee on the Study of Psychoanalytic practice, May 21, 1964
Sometimes the struggle against identification is justifiable, Sarlin
When fear is appropriate and is no indication of the successful completion of analysis, Sarlin
Languages: