By Dr. Vladimir Melamed
Title: History of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, 1950-1999
Predominant Dates:1950 -- 1996
ID: RG-30/RG-30
Primary Creator: Dr. Vladimir Melamed (1980s -- 2020s)
Extent: 4.0 Boxes
Arrangement: Use of digitized copies is preferred
Subjects: A draft of the Gentleman's agreement for the Split, February 13, 1950, Agreement between LAPSI and Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S.CA, March 1950, Albert Kandelin, an inquiry of psychoanalytic history in San Francisco, 1966, Albert Kandelin, Ernst Lewy's files for the Split discourse, 1949 - 1950, Albert Kandelin, History of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1970, Albert Kandelin, Laymen in California, an essay, 1960s, Albert Kandelin, Memorandum pertaining to the Split, May 15, 1962, Albert Kandelin, notes and reflections on the Split, ca 1960, Albert Kandelin, prospective work on Analytic History, History Committee, 1966, Albert Kandelin, provisional state of historical documents, report, June 1966, Albert Kandelin, three years of works of the History Committee, report, June 1966, A letter from David Brunswick to Emanuel Windholz,reflections on the Hendrick's discourse, 1955, A letter from Dr. Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben, in German, July 31, 1949, A letter from Dr. Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 25, 1955, A letter from Dr. Robert Knight to Ernst Lewy, June 11, 1948, A letter from Dr. Romm to Robert Knight, split discourse, April 12, 1950, A letter from Emanuel Windholz to David Brunswick, January 31, 1955, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Albert Kandelin, April 28, 1963, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben, the Split discourse, March 7, 1950, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben in German, July 10, 1949, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben in German, November 17, 1949, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz, February 13, 1950, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz relative to Dr. Brunswick letter to Hendrick, January 1955, A Letter from Ernst Lewy to Paul Holmer, discourse, October 19, 1953, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Fliess, March 11, 1950, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Knight, January 5, 1946, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Knight, June 4, 1948, A letter from Grete Ruben to Ernst Lewy, August 27, 1949, A letter from Grete Ruben to Ernst Lewy, July 16, 1949, A letter from Henry Katz to Ernst Lewy, January 23, 1950, A letter from LeRoy Maeder to Ernst Simmel, April 13, 1950, A Letter from Martin Grotjahn to Ernst Lewy, December 1950, A letter from Maxwell Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 24, 1955, A letter from Robert Knight, APA to Ernst Lewy, split discourse, March 31, 1950, A letter from Robert Knight to Ernst Lewy, January 27, 1948, A letter from Robert Knight to Romm related with her distortion of the facts of the Split, 1950, A letter from Robert Morse to Dr. Romm, split discourse, April 18, 1950, A letter from Sydney Biddle to Edward Bibring, January 4, 1950, A letter to Albert Kandelin from Emanuel Windholz, May 23, 1966, A memorandum from Ralph Greenson to Ernst Lewy, January 5, 1950, American Psychoanalytic Association, discussions and meetings, A note from Eugene Mindlin to Charles Tidd, February 20, 1950, Another institute, Grotjahn, Miller, Romm, the Split, February 1950, A provisional agreement for splitting up on two organizations, Split, 1950, Ernst Lewy, A question from Dr. Ernst Lewy why Dr. Norman Levy has been appointed a training analyst May 1950, A resignation discourse with regard to descenders from LAPSI, 1950s, Articles of Incorporation of the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S. California, March 1950, Board of Professional Standards regarding Institute of Psychoanalytic Medicine, Long Island, 1950, Board on Professional Standards, APA, recommendations on the splits of psychoanalytic institutions, Carel van der Heide, LAPSI, Dean of Training School, 1953, 1954, Collection of documents of the Simmel Family, in German, Albert Kandelin, 1966, Composition of the first psychoanalytic group in Los Angeles in the 1930s, History, Controversies in the function of the Education Committee, discourse of the Split, 1950, Controversies of lay analysis, discourse, Correspondence between David Brunswick and Emanuel Windholz, 1955, Correspondence between David Brunswick and Maxwell Gitelson, APA, 1955, Correspondence between Ernest Lewy and Martin Grotjahn, 1950s, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Emanuel Windholz, 1950s, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Grete Ruben, 1949, 1950, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Henry Katz, 1950s, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Ralph Greenson, 1950s, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Robert Fliess, Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Robert Knight, 1940s, 1950s, Correspondence between Menninger and Simmel with regard to lay analysis, 1940, History, Kandelin, Correspondence between Sydney Biddle and Edward Bibring, 1950s, Correspondences between Albert Kandelin and Emanuel Windholz, 1960s, Correspondences between Ernest Lewy and Albert Kandelin, 1960s, Correspondences between LAPSI and S.CA Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine, 1950s, Correspondences related to the question of lay analysis in LAPSI, 1955, Creation of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Institute, its relation to the Society, 1949, David Brunswick, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954, David Brunswick, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1950s, David Brunswick, to his sins of omission, a meeting of July 7, 1947, Simmel deposed, David Brunswick, uncanny memories, vexation and reckoning, the meeting of July 7, 1947, Discourse of lay analysis in LAPSI, reflections on Ives Hendrick accusations, 1955, Discourse of psychoanalytic principles and provisions, Ernst Lewy, ca 1947, Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955, Discourse of the Split, 1950, Discourse of the Split in Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949, Discourse of the Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949, Dissension in Retrospect (the Split), Kandelin, February 1963, Division of funds between the LAPSI and S.CA Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine, 1950, Document of Martin Grotjahn in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive, Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick, Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. Lawrence Friedman, Documents of American Psychoanalytic Association in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Edward Bibring in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Emanuel Windholz in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Ernst Lewy in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. GHJ Pearson in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Henry Katz in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Robert Morse in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Dr. Romm in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Eugene Mindlin in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of LeRoy Maeder in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of London Institute of Psychoanalysis, Freudian, in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Milton Miller in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of Norman Levy in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s, Documents of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society in the NCP-LA Archive, Documents related to the Split of the Psychoanalytic Institute of Los Angeles, 1950, Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee for the Psychoanalytic Society, Los Angeles, Dr. Albert Kandelin, History of Psychoanalytic Movement in Los Angeles, Dr. Albert Kandelin, narratives, collection of historical materials, Psychoanalytic Society, 1960s, Dr. David Brunswick, Split related discourses and recollections, 1960s, Dr. Emanuel Windholz, psychoanalyst, Dr. Ernest Simmel, narratives, Schloss Tegel, Dr. Ernst Lewy, devised a plan to preserve the unity of the Institute, Dr. Ernst Lewy, Director of the Institute and the Dean of the Training School, 1948 and later, Dr. Ernst Lewy, documents from the NCP-LA Archive, Dr. Ernst Lewy, efforts to preserve the Society and Institute undivided, January 3, 1950, Dr. Ernst Lewy, history of the split, ca 1960, Dr. Ernst Lewy, list of materials related to the Split of March 1950, Dr. Ernst Lewy, narratives, Dr. Gitelson advises David Brunswick to circularize his response to Hendrick, discourse, 1955, Dr. Henry Katz, a controversy between a deep psychology and simplification of the unconscious, 1949, Dr. Henry Katz, causes of the split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949, Dr. Henry Katz, division in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse, 1949, Dr. Henry Katz, emphasis on deep psychology in the study of unconscious, 1950, Dr. Henry Katz, Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949, discourse, Dr. May Romm, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, architect of the Split, Dr. Romm, distortion of the facts caused the Split, April 12, 1950, Early History of Psychoanalytic movement in Los Angeles, Education committee meeting, confrontation between traditionalists and cessationists, February 1950, Education committee meeting, Ernst Lewy is a proponent of a London plan, February 2, 1950, Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, I feel that the London plan is not acceptable, 1950, Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, one group versus another group, February 2, 1950, Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, there has to be a complete split, February 2, 1950, Education committee meeting, Tidd, Can we work together, February 2, 1950, Emanuel Windholz, support of Dr. Brunswick's response to Dr. Hendrick, discourse, 1955, Ernest Lewy, Seminar for movie-writers, in the letter to Kandelin, 1962, Ernst Lewy, a question of lay analysis was a secondary matter in the Split, in the letter to Ruben, Ernst Lewy, Confidential memorandum of the London Plan, July 27, 1949, Ernst Lewy, content of the London Plan of re-organization, July 1949, Ernst Lewy, hardship and difficulties to bring Maria's son to America, 1950, Ernst Lewy, how difficult to expedite immigration of his wife Maria son from Germany to America, Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, Director, 1953 - 1954, Ernst Lewy, Memorandum, split discourse, ca June 1950, Ernst Lewy, need for split, personal differences, January 1950, Ernst Lewy, need for split, scientific differences, January 1950, Ernst Lewy, notes on the re-organization plan, January 15, 1950, Ernst Lewy, notification for the American Psychoanalytic Association of the Split, March 24, 1950, Ernst Lewy, Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, predating the Split, June 1962, Ernst Lewy, Re-organization London Plan, 1949, Ernst Lewy, reference to the February 2, 1950 pre-Split meeting, in the letter to Grete Ruben, 1950, Ernst Lewy, reflection on the state of psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1946 --1950, notes, Ernst Lewy, reflections on the history of Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1930s - 1940s, discourse, Ernst Lewy, reflections on the state of psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1946, Ernst Lewy, reorganization plan for the Institute, January 1950, in the letter to Grete Ruben, 1950, Ernst Lewy, scientific works, Ernst Lewy, Tentative proposal for Future Regulation of Psychoanalytic Training, ca 1950, Ernst Lewy, the Split discourse, in the letter to Grete Ruben, March 7, 1950, Ernst Lewy, the state of affairs in Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1948, Ernst Lewy, to the Split, the division within the Institute existed for a long time, February 1950, Ernst Lewy and his wife Maria visited Germany in October of 1949, Maria saw her son, Ernst Lewy informs Henry Katz about the discourse initiated by Hendrick, APA, 1955, Ernst Lewy on the Split, confrontation with recent advancists, in a letter to Fliess, March 11, 1950, Ernst Simmel held a central position with regard to lay analysts, 1930s, Albert Kandelin, History, Ernst Simmel was the first physician analyst settled in Los Angeles in mid - 1930s, History, Etiology of the Split, analysis, 1950, Financial dealings between the two institutes, January 11, 1951, Forerunners of the Split, Recollections of Dr. Brunswick, May 1962, Frances Deri, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954, Funds paid to the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine by LAPSI, January 1951, Greenson, Evans, Newhouse, Rahman, Ruth Jaeger, the Old Guard, against Split, 1950, Greenson, impede appointment of training analysts, acceptance of applicants, approval of candidates, Greenson, we will not vouch for any training analysts that they could appoint, split discourse, 1950, Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, Director, Extension Division, 1953, 1954, Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954, Henry Katz, psychoanalyst, Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Institute, 1950s, 1960s, History Committee, begins to collect and narrate the documented history, 1964, History of Psychoanalysis in California, Albert Kandelin, History of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse by Sydney Biddle, 1950, History of the Psychoanalytic Institute of Los Angeles after the Split, under May Romm guidance, Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicince of S. California, the purpose of corporation, March 1950, Kupper, Tidd, McGuire, Deri, Hanna Fenichel, Brunswick, the Old Guard, against Split, 1950, LAPSI, Articles of Incorporation, written consent of the membership to the Amendment, February 1959, LAPSI, A teaching and training programs, 1950s, LAPSI, By-Laws, Article I, Members, ca 1960, LAPSI, By-Laws, Article II, Dues and Fees, ca 1960, LAPSI, By-Laws, Article III, Admission to membership, ca 1960, LAPSI, By-Laws, Article V, Membership meetings, ca 1960, LAPSI, Curriculum and Bibliography, Spring 1952, LAPSI, Curriculum committee, composition, 1959, LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive, LAPSI, Elected officers and committees, By-Laws, December 1966, LAPSI, Faculty committee, composition, 1959, LAPSI, Fees and training grants, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, first year course, Child Psychoanalysis, Specialized (elective), 1959, LAPSI, first year course, Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique, 1959, LAPSI, first year course, General Theory of Neuroses, 1959, LAPSI, first year course, Hysteria and Phobias, 1959, LAPSI, first year course, Introduction to Ego Psychology, 1959, LAPSI, first year course, Obsessive-Compulsive Neuroses, 1959, LAPSI, first year course, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, 1959, LAPSI, Four-year courses of studies, description and literature, July 15, 1959, LAPSI, fourth year course, Child analysis, General, 1959, LAPSI, Lectures and seminars, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, lectures and seminars for analysts in training, 1959, LAPSI, Library Committee, composition, 1959, LAPSI, Personal analysis, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, Private practice of students, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, Psychiatric experience, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, Research Committee, composition, 1959, LAPSI, second year course, Clinical conference, Problem of Analyzability, 1959, LAPSI, second year course, Neurotic and Psychotic Depression, 1959, LAPSI, second year course, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, (II), 1959, LAPSI, second year course, Technique of Dream Interpretation, 1959, LAPSI, Selection of students, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, Selection of training analysts, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, Study, Teaching and Advancing of Psychoanalysis, By-Laws, December 1966, LAPSI, Supervision of clinical work, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, the personal analysis, discourse, 1959, LAPSI, third year course, Controversial concepts, 1959, LAPSI, third year course, Perversions, and Impulse Neuroses, 1959, LAPSI, third year course, Schizophrenia, Paranoid and allied disorders, 1959, LAPSI, Training in child analysis, training provisions, 1950s, LAPSI, training provisions and regulations, 1950s, LAPSI, Training School, the stages of training, 1958, LAPSI, Training School, General Principles, 1958, Lawrence Friedman, his vision of the Split, March 1, 1950, Lewy, division in the Institute is due scientific differences and personal factors, Split, 1950, Lewy, Education Committee meeting, hostility and frictions, February 2, 1950, Lewy, Education Committee meeting, re-organization plan, February 2, 1950, Lincoln Rahman, LAPSI, Director, Psychoanalytic Clinic, 1953, 1954, London Institute of Psychoanalysis, London Institute of Psychoanalysis, Freudian conceptions, London Institute of Psychoanalysis, lectures and courses, the summer term, 1949, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, 1953 -- 1954, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, annual reports, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, Articles of Incorporation, 1959, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1946, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Membership roster, October 13, 1958, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, business meeting, agenda, September 22, 1966, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, LAPSI, History of the organization, Los Angeles Society and Institute, a search for resolution of tensions and controversies, 1960s, Los Angeles Society and Institute, revised By-Laws, Membership, June 1966, Los Angeles Society and Institute, the Old Guard, 1950, Los Angeles Society and Institute, the revised By-Laws, Committee of Mutual Problems, June 1966, LSPSI, first year, Psychoanalytic theory of Instincts, 1959, Maria, wife of Ernst Lewy, met her son in German after ten years of separation, letter to Ruben, Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst, APA, Maxwell Gitelson supports LAPSI against accusation of Hendrick, 1955, Meeting at Ernst Lewy home, preparation for the Split, minutes, February 25, 1950, Meeting at the Ernst Lewy house, discussion of the present split discourse, April 15, 1950, Members of the first psychoanalytic group in Los Angeles, 1930s, History of Psychoanalysis, Memorandum presented to Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society by Dr. GHJ Pearson, November 4, 1949, Menninger and Simmel, variance in perception of lay analysts, in correspondence, 1940, History, My passivity about evolving implementation of the Split, Dr. Brunswick, Notes of the meeting at Ernst Lewy's house, split discourse, April 15, 1950, Not to facilitate the further recognition of the other institute, the Lewy's group decision, 1950, Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, controversies with regard to training methodology, Biddle, Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, History, Pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 2, 1950, Pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 13, 1950, Proposed By-Laws, LAPSI, December 15, 1966, Proposed By-Laws of the Institute and Society, LAPSI, 1960s, Provisions for the imminent division of the Society and Institute, February 13, 1950, Psychoanalysis, discourse and conceptions, Ralph Greenson, Memorandum, the new institute, May 11, 1950, Report of the History Committee, Albert Kandelin, June 16, 1964, Resignation expected from the former members of LAPSI who descended, Lewy, December 15, 1950, Romm, Split, confrontational position, 1950, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Society, 1942, Sanitarium Schloss Tegel Inc., Psychiatric Hospital, 1927, Southern California Psychiatric Society, history, Kandelin, 1970, Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse by Sydney Biddle, 1950, Statement of Lawrence Friedman, discourse, March 1, 1950, Structure of the Institute and Society, July 15, 1959, Substantiation for the establishment of two institutes, February 1950, Sydney Biddle with regard to the Split in Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1950, Teaching of Psychoanalysis, London Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1949, Tensions in the Society and Institute, 1940s, 1950s, The Candidate Committee, Psychoanalytic Institute, 1950, The course of the pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 2, 1950, The first nine directors of the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S. California, March 1950, The formation of a separate institute was inevitable, 1950, The present Institute, Brunswick, Lewy, Deri, Greenson, Tidd, the Split, February 1950, The role of laymen in establishing of psychoanalytic institutions in California, early history, The Split on two psychoanalytic institutes, 1950, The view of the Freudian training analysts, Education Committee and the Institute, March 1950, Three members of the Education Committee will apply to form another psychoanalytic institute, Split, Ties between the two institutes, Martin Grotjahn in the letter to Ernest Lewy, 1950, Variants of actions with regard to the approval of the other institute, the Lewy's group, 1950, Walter Briehl, Exploratory Committee, 1949, Working on the content and phraseology of the imminent division, the Split, February 1950, Works of History Committee, presentations, 1960s
This Collection is a conglomerate of professional and personal discourses relative to the continuity of teaching and research in Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles. It presents multiple and often controversial viewpoints on the theory and application of Psychoanalysis. Scientific, corporative and professional rivalry had been coming along the thorny process of the functionating of psychoanalytic institutions in Los Angeles. Inward and outward confrontation for many decades remained intrinsic to the very existence of psychoanalytic institutions in California vis-a-vis with the guiding organization, namely American Psychoanalytic Association.
This Collection, de-facto an Archive of LAPSi serves as an extensive narrative and an existential survey on the landmarks of a historical discourse of Psychoanalytic Science in Los Angeles. This multi-vectorial work attempts to reveal the role of geo-political milieu, the influence of the leading scholars and the externalization of psychoanalytic institutions. Digitization of our archival documents and corresponding Collection-Building will serve as a premise for existential and psychoanalytic analysis. In the result, our growing Archival Collections shall become a public and educational source for psychoanalytic studies.
This Collection is a conglomerate of professional and personal discourses relative to the continuity of teaching and research in Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles. It presents multiple and often controversial viewpoints on the theory and application of Psychoanalysis. Scientific, corporative and professional rivalry had been coming along the thorny process of the functionating of psychoanalytic institutions in Los Angeles. Inward and outward confrontation for many decades remained intrinsic to the very existence of psychoanalytic institutions in California vis-a-vis with the guiding organization, namely American Psychoanalytic Association.
The elicited documents sensibly elucidate the often perplex edifice of psychoanalytic institutions in Los Angeles and elsewhere.
These documents demonstrate often uncanny ramifications of theoretical and administrative transmutations experienced by the psychoanalytic institutions in Los Angeles as well as in America in the 1950s -- 1990s. These transmutations presented through the theoretical and administrative utterance that may be mutually refuted by the corresponding subjects.
Use of digitized copies is preferred
History of psychoanalytic institution in Los Angeles begins in the mid of the 1930s with official establishment of the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Group under the chairmanship of Dr. Ernest Simmel. He saw his goal to re-create and actualize the psychoanalytic institutions that he had been managing in Berlin, namely a Psychoanalytic Institute and Psychoanalytic Clinic. From 1938 to 1947, he continuously worked to implement the European-like psychoanalytic establishment in Los Angeles. It was exhausting, wearing and more importantly often a futile pursuit. American professional and business circles were foreign and unattainable to comprehend and support pure science and pure mental health caring.
Most of his efforts to solicit support for the Institute and Clinic faced a wall of indifference and denials. Although Dr. Simmel and several of his devoted colleagues, also from Europe, succeeded in a formal or rather virtual establishment of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis in 1946, the actual edifice of what still remained on paper. At this very time when this long-striving goal had become somewhat closer to implementation, the internal discontent, emanated from the strict proponents of pragmatic psychoanalysis, subordinated to the medical profession of psychiatry, culminated in crumbling of the entire edifice of the Dr. Simmel’s phantom of a full-fledged psychoanalytic institution.
A pragmatic group of the younger medical doctors raised on American, strictly medical and business-oriented tradition, then prevailed in Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society that de-jure had received vestiges of a psychoanalytic institute. In July 1947 this group, namely Dr. Romm, Dr. Grotjahn and Dr. Miller with the support of some others, deposed Dr. Ernest Simmel, then President of the Society and Chairman of Education Committee from all his posts. In November of the same year Dr. Ernest Simmel passed away.
From 1947 to 1950, the colleagues of late Dr. Simmel, by and large they were adherent to classical psychoanalysis, found themselves in a peculiar position. Reluctant to follow the suit of pragmatic and medicalized psychoanalysis, realizing its artifice and nature and that a subservient role invariably would await them, rose to emphatic claiming of the veracity in paradigms and to the delineation between the concealed motifs and fundamental principles.
In the three-year period, the non-conformists or the followers of late Dr. Ernest Simmel had explicated an unwavering stance for the traditional scientific principles and by doing so, they had liberated themselves from the imposed on them medicalization of Psychoanalysis.
In 1949 – 1950, a clear rift between the two groups, namely the group adherent to the Freudian principles and tenets in perception and teaching of Psychoanalysis and the group of the younger members whose scientific credo was not so obvious had become apparent.
The cohort of those Freudian analysts who since the 1930s worked to advance the Freudian principles of Psychoanalysis as a science had been confronted for entangled reasons by the newcomers and secessionists whose scientific perspective was rather vague, but personal ambitions were well spelled out.
Dr. Ernst Lewy took upon himself a burden of carrying on the effort of preservation of a status quo that is keeping both parties under ‘one roof’, through the implementation of a London Plan. The nine-month efforts of communications, meetings, correspondences rendered no positive effect. The secession was imminent.
Dr. Ernst Lewy in alliance with David Brunswick, Frances Deri Ralph Greenson and Charles Tidd continued to keep with the Freudian tradition of scholarship and teaching. The newer member, namely Milton Miller, Martin Grotjahn and May E. Romm, characterized by a more formal than scientific differences in teaching approaches and more certainly of the personal discontent with the group maintaining the principles of Freudian school of thought, saw a resolution in separation and establishing a psychoanalytic institution of their own. They demonstrated no interest for a compromise and were indifferent to preservation of unity to Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis.
As we said earlier, the profound scientific and personal mistrust and full disapproval, especially on the part of Miller, Grotjahn and Romm had become fait accompli.
The meeting of Education Committee held on February 2, 1950, had become a conclusive demonstration that there was a point of no return.
Here are some excerpts from this proceeding:
Dr. Ernst Lewy: “The criticism has come from both sides, very definitely. This group has been accused of being rigid, orthodox, inflexible, closed-minded to so-called recent advances. Whenever such points as the pamphlet, proposals to the Board of Professional Standards, etc. were discussed, we had the differences of opinion on orthodoxy, cutting down hours, manipulation, etc.”
Dr. Tidd: “I am not entirely convinced that it is only a matter of theory that is involved. I think the personal differences are more important than the other. If it is correct that this present state of being is due to personal difficulties, we ought to face that and do something about it. The first question is: can we work together.”
Greenson: “Can we work together as we have been going or do we need a new way.”
Miller: There are certainly differences of opinion which should exist and od exist in every psychoanalytic organization. The peculiar thing about this group is the sharp demarcation, one group versus another group. There are many things we do not know and I want to know a lot more. I cannot foster this urge of mine in this atmosphere, it is just impossible.
My conclusion has been that there is only one possibility as far as a real solution is concerned and that is that there has to be a complete split.”
Miller: “You (Greenson) may feel you have the correct scientific point of view. My own point of views is just as doubtful of theories as yours. I fell there is a certain difference of thought and approach that always comes down to an emotional outburst, accusations of some kind or maneuvering. So much time is consumed by this it leaves little time for scientific matters. I feel that the time for a split has come in which each part can freely re-vitalize itself instead of trying to spend energy in keeping together. “
De facto, the proponent of holding up to the status quo and to follow the constructs of a London Plan and the utterly decisive proponent of the split have agreed to complete the arrangement for the division of the Institute on the next Education Committee meeting on February 13, 1950.
In the course of this last common meeting of the Education Committee, there was no longer theoretical discussions, but the technicalities of divisions came into fore. Then the members of both groups agreed to a provisional division of the funds in the proportion of 3/7 of each articles.
The stirring up tensions between the two groups engendered an unraveled statement and the ensuing act on the part of “old guard.”
They issued a Memorandum of Principles or rather The Declaration of Separation was rather modestly entitled as Statement for the Candidates’ Meeting, March 3, 1950. In this four-page document, David Brunswick, Frances Deri, Ralph Greenson, Ernst Lewy and Charles Tidd, clearly delineated the fundamental principles of Psychoanalysis, the Classical Psychoanalysis, as they called it from the revisionists and unequivocally rejected conformity with business-oriented pragmatism in Psychoanalysis.
The other group or how they commonly were referred to as secessionists, energetically commenced activities that enabling them the establishment of an independent psychoanalytic entity, namely The Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of Southern California.
They applied to American Psychoanalytic Association for recognition as soon as March 1950. They urged the respective committees of the APA to accelerate the rendering of a positive decision. As early as in May 1950, this group submitted the Articles of Incorporation to the local authorities and registered this Institute as the Non-Profit Corporation with the proper Californian authorities.
The Articles of Incorporation listed the first time nine Directors of this corporation. Those were all the major secessionists and their followers, all were former members of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis.
Here are their names: Dr. Milton Miller, Dr. Norman Levy, Dr. Walter Briehl, Dr. Martin Grotjahn, Dr. May E. Romm, Dr. Judd Marmor, Dr. Arthur A. Clinco, Dr. Frederick Hacker, Dr. George Frumkes.
In the course of 1950, The Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of Southern California was recognized by American Psychoanalytic Association. By the end of December 1950, its leadership submitted formal resignation from all trusteeship, executive and education committee positions that they previously held to the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis. The division of funds had begun in 1950 and was completed in 1951.
Although the formalities have been settled, the ramifications of the Split have had a long, protracted and continuous effect on the discourse of Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles and elsewhere.
The Document provisioned: “the formation of a separate Institute was indicated. The profound Six non- negotiable Principles were hereby stated.
In the future discourses, dated largely by the period of 1960s, the division onto two separate institute would be referred as The Split. This term has de-facto entered into the historiography about Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles and since then is commonly referred as The Split. In the same historiography the role of a personal factor has also gained a status of its own. We also believe that the role of personalities was divisive and eventually determined the course onto imminent division.
The Creators of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (proto-LAPSI), although being the most affected by the conformists and by the discordance to the moral principles, nevertheless reflected on the personal factor as follows, “The question of personal and emotional factors as the basis for this separation has been frequently raised. There is no doubt that personality factors are interwoven with the scientific differences that does add to the incompatibility.”
The utterance inferred in the statement, “It is believed that the formation of two separate Institutes will make possible a more cordial scientific atmosphere, since it will do away with much of the latent hostility that existed until now.”
This Statement was signed by David Brunswick, Frances Deri, Ralph Greenson, Ernst Lewy and Charles Tidd.
Then the Constitution and By-Laws of the Society and Institute were drafted and after several revisions, adopted in April 1951.
The Article III, Membership, would become a platform for the adherence to the position of non-conformism as well as for plausible concessions to the realities of American psychoanalytic establishment.
Thus, active membership was open only for physicians (doctors of medicine) who shall have completed training in psychoanalysis in accordance with the Standards established by the American Psychoanalytic Association or have been regular or associated members in good standing of an affiliate society of the American or International Psychoanalytic Association.
Provisions with regard to Accredited Membership was formulated in a defiance to the expectations of American Psychoanalytic Association and soon will have vexed this Association.
This membership remained open to those medical doctors who did not have a medical license for practicing in California.
The next provision with regard to accredited membership was an emphatic and strenuous manifestation for the non-renunciation of their fundamental principles.
Most importantly accredited membership remained open for non-medical psychoanalysts who were accepted for training before June1, 1938 by an Institute recognized by the American or International Psychoanalytic Association and whose training in Psychoanalysis has conformed to the standards for the training of medical psychoanalysts.
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis also established in 1950 according to its By-Laws had been organized to instruct properly qualified physicians in the theory, technique and application of Psychoanalysis as developed by Sigmund Freud and his pupils.
The Institute strives to acquaint other qualified individuals in related professional, academic and educational field with those subjects of Psychoanalysis that are pertinent to their respective fields.
The Institute will conduct research in development in the theory, technique and applications of psychoanalysis.
The Institute should provide a consultation service for and facilities for psychoanalytically oriented treatment of personality disturbances in individuals of limited means and to further such other useful applications of Psychoanalysis as may become practicable.
From the beginning of 1955, the correspondences between American Psychoanalytic Association and Dr. David Brunswick, then President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, manifested a disquieting stance on the part of Dr. Hendrick, President of the American.
On behalf of the American, Dr. Hendrick expressed impeding facts that in the view of the medical colleagues are problematic if not incompatible with the standards of American Psychoanalytic Society.
Largely this facticity did not correspond neither to the letter of the American’s standards nor it was credible in term veracity and actuality. By and large the Hendrick’s letter reflected his personal viewpoint that to some degree had been instigated by the letter of Dr. Noyes, President of American Psychiatric Association. Dr. Noyes perhaps had personal or other reasons to view the Los Angeles psychoanalytic institutions in the light of dissent.
For example, Dr. Hendrick wrote: “The fact is that during my term of office I have had several communications from our members by letter and have heard several references in committee to the lay instructors and to the situation in your society.”
Hendrick’s projections on the future of the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society (he perhaps meant the Institute as well) were rather grim. He concluded his letter with such predictions: “But I do believe that in the long run this problem in Los Angeles will inevitably create major difficulties, not only for the American Psychoanalytic Association, but for your own Society in its relationship to the medical profession.”
This letter became so-to-speak an open letter for the colleagues in the American and from other psychoanalytic societies commenced its circulation between the membership.
On January 20, 1955, Dr. David Brunswick, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society refuted the accusations of Dr. Hendrick and ad hoc copied the correspondences to his colleagues in Los Angeles and to the other psychoanalytic societies.
Dr. Brunswick firmly and consistently clarified the imposed on the Los Angeles psychoanalytic organization deficiencies. He repudiated the warranty of the erroneous and imputed facticity. His letter was highly regarded even by the colleagues from the American Psychoanalytic Association.
The refutation was presented in the fact-by-fact manner.
Discussion in your correspondence pertain to the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis rather than to the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society.
Our training analysts and lecturers do not offer instructions in ‘psychotherapy’ but in psychoanalysis.
Our non-medical personnel have been appointed in conformity with the 1938 Resolution with the approval of the American Psychoanalytic Association and has functioned with its continued approval.
The APA clause of 1938 does not jeopardize the future status of the laymen who at the date of adoption of this resolution are already trained or in training for the practice of Psychoanalysis. It is in conformity with the second half of this paragraph (3) that the appointment of non-medical instructors in our Institute have been made.
I believe that the difficulties have come not from training by laymen but from the training (suspected or actual) of laymen.
It seems that the strength of your feelings about all these questions caused you to exaggerate our ‘wickedness’.
On your last page you express the opinion that ‘this problem in Los Angeles will inevitably create major difficulties not only for the APA but for your own Society in the relationship to the medical profession’. I want to point out, Dr. Hendrick that so far we have not had any such difficulties.
We do not expect to have any such difficulties unless they should be stirred up from outside. We hope that you are knowing the facts will help to prevent any such unwarranted stirring up.
Since this correspondence went on in open circulation many colleagues manifested support to Dr. Brunswick position and in general criticized the negative approach taken by Dr. Hendrick.
Among other letters of support, we shall emphasize the turn to a moderate policy and tolerance taken by the APA’s President-Elect Dr. Maxwell Gitelson.
President-Elect Dr. Gitelson expressed his disagreement with the position taken by the sitting President Dr. Hendrick. Dr. Gitelson outline his perspective in the letter sent on January 6, 1955 to Dr. Hendrick.
I am rather distress by your letter of January 4 addressed to Dr. Brunswick, President of the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society.
In the first place, the problem is one that does not technically refer to the Society but to the Institute of the Los Angeles Society. But, more important, I feel that it is a mistake to stir up new particular issue at this time when there are so many really important comprehensive problems with which we are concerned and which I think should have priority before particulars are attended to.
For these reasons I do not think it is advisable at this time to open up the matter of the role of lay analysts on the faculty of the Los Angeles Institute. I see nothing but the stirring up of fruitless conflict.
In the beginning of the 1960s, the Society, the Institute and the Training School had become experience difficulties in efficacy of scholarship and management. The functions of the committees, primarily with regard to the Education Committee stretched and overlapped, thus by far making complicated the functioning of the Organization as a whole psychoanalytic institution.
In 1964, the Joint Committee on Mutual Problems of Society and Institute was appointed. This Committee was entrusted with finding the flaws and incoherencies in the three branches of the LAPSI. To see a broader picture, the Committee had to analyze the possible historical causations of the currently experienced disfunctions.
The Committee continued the search for problematic functioning in the course of two years. They have found those areas of which the engendering difficulties could affect the Dysfunctioning of the entire Organization.
On September 15, 1966, the Committee submitted the Report and Recommendations. They have determined specific organizational, administrative and scientific issues, causing ‘the mutual problems’. Resultant of the domineering inconsistencies have been the following problems: Confusion, Poor Communication, Encouragement of Rivalry and Divisive Political Power Orientations. The effective disenfranchisement of the Institute membership in Institute affairs. The ineffective organization and use of faculty. The autonomous, self-perpetuating function of the Education Committee in running the Training School and to some considerable extent the Institute. The personal and political power structures and confrontations fostered by the above rather than dissipated. The inhibition and stultification in controlling structures that had not adapted to changing needs of a developing group. The broad problem of the infant science and revolutionary movement come upon premature middle-age. It is a need to maintain flexibility but avoid expedience.
The Committee, chaired by Dr. Maimon Leavitt, suggested a clearly delineated subdivision, namely between the Society, Institute and Training School. The power of the committees shall be vested in the authority and responsibility of the membership and be exercised their elected officers. The school will be operated independently by its faculty, the psychoanalysis of candidates will be separated from the general teaching functions and administrative necessities of a training school.
Accordingly, a new By-Laws have been narrated that ideally should have reflected the suppositions of improvements outlined by the Committee. There were several versions of the By-Laws with regard to the revised narratives.
In December of 1966 the new By-Laws have been proposed. The name of the organization was changed to the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (the Society-Institute) and so was its structure.
RG-30.01, Albert Kandelin, How it began, early 1950s
Creator,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee (1961 - 1965)
Subjects,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, History of Psychoanalytic Movement in Los Angeles
Albert Kandelin, History of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1970
Southern California Psychiatric Society, history, Kandelin, 1970
Walter Briehl, Exploratory Committee, 1949
San Francisco Psychoanalytic Society, 1942
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1946
Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.02, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, 1953 – 1954
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Carel van der Heide, LAPSI, Dean of Training School, 1953, 1954
David Brunswick, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Diana Howard, LAPSI, Executive Secretary, 1953, 1954
Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, Director, 1953 - 1954
Frances Deri, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, Director, Extension Division, 1953, 1954
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Lincoln Rahman, LAPSI, Director, Psychoanalytic Clinic, 1953, 1954
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, 1953 -- 1954
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, annual reports
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, officers, names. 1953, 1954
Richard Evans, LAPSI, lecturer, 1953, 1954
Ralph Greenson, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Robert Jokl, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Ivan McGuire, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Carel van der Heide, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Charles Tidd, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Annual Report, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Structure by committees, 1953-1954
LAPSI, The Training School, program, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Psychoanalytic Clinic, purposes and works, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Extension Division, courses, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Statement of financial assessment, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Diana Howard, LAPSI, Executive Secretary, 1953, 1954
Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, Director, 1953 - 1954
Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Frances Deri, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, Director, Extension Division, 1953, 1954
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Ivan McGuire, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Annual Report, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, Extension Division, courses, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Psychoanalytic Clinic, purposes and works, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Statement of financial assessment, 1953-1954
LAPSI, Structure by committees, 1953-1954
LAPSI, The Training School, programs, 1953-1954
Lincoln Rahman, LAPSI, Director, Psychoanalytic Clinic, 1953, 1954
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, 1953 -- 1954
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, annual reports
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, officers, names. 1953, 1954
Ralph Greenson, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
Richard Evans, LAPSI, lecturer, 1953, 1954
Robert Jokl, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953-1954
RG-30.03, Maimon Leavitt, By-Laws, amendments, January 1967
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Maimon Leavitt, LASPIS, Director, memos, 1960s
LAPSI, Business meetings, 1960s
LAPSI, Institute and Society, elections, 1960s
LAPSI, Business meeting, January 26, 1967
LAPSI, By-Laws and revisions, 1960s
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.04, Proposed By-Laws of the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, 1960s
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
LAPSI, By-Laws and revisions, 1960s
Proposed By-Laws of the Institute and Society, LAPSI, 1960s
LAPSI, the Institute and Society, structure, 1960s
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.05, Manual for Psychoanalytic candidates, LAPSI, 1958
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
LAPSI, Manual for Psychoanalytic Candidates, 1958
Psychoanalytic candidates, personal analysis is integral part of the training program, LAPSI, 1958
LAPSI, training structure, 1958
LAPSI, lectures and seminars, structure, 1958
LAPSI, Colloquium I, informal oral examination, 1958
LAPSI, Supervised clinical work, structure, 1958
LAPSI, Colloquium II, after candidate completed the courses, 1958
LAPSI, Requirements for graduation, 1958
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, membership roster, 1958
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.06, A letter to Dr. Robert Jokl from Dr. Paul Bergman, November 24, 1952
Creator,
Dr. Paul Bergman, psychoanalyst, scholar
Subjects,
Dr. Robert Jokl, psychoanalyst, scholar, LAPSI
Dr. Paul Bergman, psychoanalyst, scholar, the Menninger Foundation
A letter from Paul Bergman to Robert Jokl, November 24, 1952
Documents of Paul Bergman in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Robert Jokl from NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.07, Revised manual for Training Analyst, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1961
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
LAPSI, A revised manual for training analysts, 1961
LAPSI, Committees of the Training School, 1961
LAPSI, Admission Committee, Training School, 1961
LAPSI, Curriculum Committee, Training School, 1961
LAPSI, Faculty Committee, Training School, 1961
LAPSI, Committee on Child Analysis, Training School, 1961
LAPSI, Bulletins, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.08, Menninger Foundation, Instructions on Health-Sickness Rating Scale, 1952
Creator,
The Menninger Foundation
Subjects,
The Menninger Psychiatric Clinic, 1930s -- 1950s
The Menninger Psychiatric Clinic, instructions and guidelines
Menninger Psychiatric Clinic, Instructions for Health-Sickness rating scale, 1952
Criteria for evaluation and treatment, Menninger psychiatric clinic, 1952
Definitions of scale points, Menninger Clinic, 1952
Examples of scale points, Menninger Clinic, 1952
Sample case descriptions, Menninger Clinic, 1952
Documents from the Menninger Clinic in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.09, Research proposal for evaluation of psychotherapy, Dr. Donald Watterson, 1952
Creator,
Donald Waterson, psychiatrist
Subjects,
Evaluation in Psychotherapy, conceptions
Donald Watterson, Research Proposal for Evaluation of Psychotherapy, Menninger Clinic, 1952
Donald Watterson, developing of scale for rating mental health, 1952
Psychotherapy, methods and discourse, 1950s
Documents of Donald Watterson in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.10, L. Luborsky, Supplement to Progress of the Health-Sickness Rating Scale, 1952
Creator,
Dr. L. Luborsky, psychiatrist
Subjects,
Health-Sickness rating scale in Psychotherapy, 1950s
L. Luborsky, Reliability Studies of Health-Sickness Scale in Psychotherapy, 1952
Psychotherapy, conceptions and discourse
Documents of Dr. L. Luborsky in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.11, Albert Kandelin, About the Library, Simmel-Fenichel Library, 1960s
Creator,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee (1961 - 1965)
Subjects,
Albert Kandelin, Simmel-Fenichel Memorial Library, narrative, 1960s
Collection of the Freud-Simmel correspondence, rescued by Frances Deri
Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s
Dr. Nunes communicated to Dr. Kandelin the principles of archiving the documents of the Society 1962
Inception of the Library relates to 1935, Kandelin, 1960s
LAPSI, 344 N. Bedford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA
Peter A. Tararin, M.S.L.S., Librarian, The Simmel-Fenichel Memorial Library
School for Nursery Years, 512 N. Rossmore Ave., Los Angeles, 1940
School for Nursery Years, endorsed by Dr. Simmel, 1940
School for Nursery Years since 1945 was located on Alfred St., Los Angeles, Kandelin, 1960s
Simmel-Fenichel Library becomes an official repository in 1952, Kandelin, 1960s
Simmel - Fenichel Memorial Library, collection of literature and bibliography of psychoanalysis, NCP
Simmel-Fenichel Memorial Library contains about 2000 books, Kandelin, 1960s
Society and Institute, 407 Commercial Center St. BH, for short time, Kandelin, 1960s
Society and Institute were founded in 1946, Kandelin, 1960s
The School for Nursery Years was founded in 1940, Kandelin, 1960s
Zettlin and Ver Brugge Booksellers, Los Angeles, Freud-Simmel correspondences
RG-30.12, A. Kandelin, The first official Psychoanalytic Society in California, 1965
Creator,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee (1961 - 1965)
Subjects,
Ernest Simmel, lay analysts have merit to psychoanalytic practice in Los Angeles
Ernest Simmel, personal history, scholarship and social standing
Ernest Simmel, scientific work in Los Angeles since 1934
History of Psychoanalysis
History of Psychoanalysis in California, Albert Kandelin
Lay analysis is seen as disadvantage to medical profession in America, continuous controversies
The role of Dr. Ernest Simmel in formation of psychoanalytic studies in California
Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s
Documents of Albert Kandelin in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.13, State University of New York, Psychoanalytic Institute, 1953-1954
Creator,
Psychoanalytic Institute, State University of New York
Subjects,
Psychoanalytic Institute, New York, 1950s
Psychoanalytic Institute of New York, structure and faculty, 1950s
Mission of the Psychoanalytic Institute of New York, 1950s
Psychoanalytic Institute in New York, psychoanalytic medicine, 1950s
Psychoanalytic Institute in New York, Curriculum, 1950s
Psychoanalytic institutions, teaching and research
Documents of the Psychoanalytic Institute in New York in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.14, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Constitution and By-Laws, 1951
Creator,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, founding documents, 1950s
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Constitution and By-Laws, 1951
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Articles of the Constitutions, 1951
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, provisions, categories of membership, 1950s
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, By-Laws, articles, 1951
Documents of the Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.15, The Training School of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1952
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Training School, 1950s
LAPSI, The Training School, mission statement, 1952
LAPSI, The Training School, Requirements for Admission, 1952
LAPSI, The Training School, the Preparatory (Personal) Analysis, 1952
LAPSI, The Training School, Supervised clinical work, provisions, 1952
Documents of the Training School, LAPSI, 1950S, in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.16, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, a required book list, ca 1952
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
LAPSI, bibliography, reading lists
LAPSI, required book list, ca 1952
Psychoanalytic literature recommended for training, LAPSI, CA 1952
LAPSI, Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.17, Statement of Principles, formation of a separate Institute, March 3, 1950
Creators,
Dr. Ernst Lewy, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, scholar (1944 -- 1963)
Frances Deri, psychoanalyst, scholar (1930s -- 1960s)
Ralph Greenson, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst (1911 -- 1979)
Dr. Charles Tidd, scholar, psychoanalyst (1935 -- 1950)
Dr. David Brunswick, scholar, psychoanalyst, psychiatrist (1930s -- 1960s)
Subjects,
Statement of principles, Lewy, Deri, Greenson, Brunswick, Tidd, 1950
Dissension, discourse and the political narrative, 1950
Causation for the Split, inevitable causes, 1946 --- 1950
Disagreement in the light of personal and conceptional factors, two narratives, 1950
The formation of a separate institute was inevitable, 1950
Scientific concepts of the non-split group, 1950
Personality factors are relative to the scientific differences, separation on two institutes, 1950
Formation of two psychoanalytic institute in Los Angeles, discourse, 1950s
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.18, By-Laws of Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, ca 1950
Creator,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (1950s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, By-Laws, ca 1950
LAPSI, mission statement, ca 1950
LAPSI, divisions of the Institute, ca 1950
LAPSI, members, provisions, ca 1950
LAPSI, officers, provisions, ca 1950
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.19, Psychoanalytic and Psychiatry Bibliography, 1950s
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, bibliography, LAPSI, 1950s
Literature on Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, LAPSI, 1950S
LAPSI, teaching Psychoanalysis, bibliography, 1950s
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.20, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Constitution, revised, ca 1951
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (1950s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Constitution and By-Laws, revised, ca 1951
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Constitution, revised, ca 1951
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.21, Answers to the questions of Dr. Mindlin, discourse, two institutes, March 1950
Creators,
Dr. Charles Tidd, scholar, psychoanalyst (1935 -- 1950)
Dr. David Brunswick, scholar, psychoanalyst, psychiatrist (1930s -- 1960s)
Dr. Ernst Lewy, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, scholar (1944 -- 1963)
Frances Deri, psychoanalyst, scholar (1930s -- 1960s)
Ralph Greenson, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst (1911 -- 1979)
Subjects,
Etiology of the Split, analysis, 1950
Discourse of the Split, 1950
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.22, Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, historical chronology
Creator,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee (1961 - 1965)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, historical chronology, Albert Kandelin, 1963
Thomas and Margrit Libbin arrive in Los Angeles, 1927
David Brunswick arrives in Los Angeles, 1930
Ernest Simmel arrives in Los Angeles, 1934
Psychoanalytic Study Group of LA is organized, 1935
Ernest Simmel, first President of the Psychoanalytic Group, 1935
Otto Fenichel arrives in Los Angeles, 1938
First West Coast Psychoanalytic meeting, March 1940
School for Nursery Years is founded, 1940
The San Francisco Psychoanalytic Society is founded, 1942
Dian Howard employed by Dr. Simmel as Secretary for the Society, 1944
School for Nursery Years located at 563 N. Alfred Street, Los Angeles, 1945
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society is founded, 1946
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Institute is founded, 1946
Otto Fenichel died on January 22, 1946
The San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute is founded, 1947
Ernest Simmel died on November 11, 1947
The Split on two psychoanalytic institutes, 1950
LAPSI office and auditorium located at 344 N. Bedford Drive, Beverly Hills, 1953
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s
RG-30.23, Fund-Raising Project, 1950 - 1952, Albert Kandelin, 1962
Creator,
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee (1961 - 1965)
Subjects,
History Committee of the Psychoanalytic Society, 1961 - 1965
History of the Society-Institute, 1950s
Documents of Albert Kandelin in the NCP-LA Archive
Dr. Albert Kandelin, History of Psychoanalytic Movement in Los Angeles
Albert Kandelin trained in psychoanalysis by Dr. Ernest Simmel, Brunswick
Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s
Fund-Raising Project, Society-Institute, 1950 -- 1952
Ernest Lewy, Fund-Raising Project, Society-Institute, 1950 -- 1952
Ernest Lewy, Fund-Raising Project, Society-Institute, discourse
Ernest Lewy, History of the Drive against Fund-Raising and related Matters, 1951, narrative
Documents of Dr. Ernst Lewy in the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.24, Letter to Noyes from Hendrick, exclusion of lay analysts, December 1954
Creator,
Ives Hendrick, President of APA, co-founder of Boston Psychoanalytic Society
Subjects,
Ives Hendrick, President of APA, Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute
Arthur Noyes, psychiatric hospital administrator President of American Psychiatric Association 1950s
Correspondence between Ives Hendrick and Arthur Noyes, 1950s
To the question of lay analysis in LAPSI, Arthur Noyes, December 1954
A letter from Ives Hendrick to Arthur Noyes, LAPSI, December 1954
APA, Minimal Standards for the Training of Physicians in Psychoanalysis, 1938
The 1938 Provisions for lay analysts, exceptions
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Documents of Ives Hendrick in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.25, from Henrick, President of APA to Brunswick, LA Psychoanalytic, January 4, 1955
Creator,
Ives Hendrick, President of APA, co-founder of Boston Psychoanalytic Society (1898 -- 1972)
Subjects,
Correspondence between Ives Hendrick and David Brunswick, 1955
A letter from Ives Hendrick to David Brunswick, January 4, 1955
Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955
Ives Hendrick, deviation from the APA standards in Los Angeles Society-Institute, 1955
Ives Hendrick, a negative role of lay analysis in the letter to Brunswick, January 4, 1955
Documents of Ives Hendrick in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.26, Brunswick fending off Hendrick at his accusations, January 20, 1955
Creator,
Dr. David Brunswick, scholar, psychoanalyst, psychiatrist (1930s -- 1960s)
Subjects,
Correspondence between Ives Hendrick and David Brunswick, 1955
David Brunswick, a letter to Ives Hendrick, unwarranted accusations, January 20, 1955
David Brunswick, refuting the unwarranted accusations of Hendrick, January 1955
Ives Hendrick, APA vs. Los Angeles Society and Institute, 1955
David Brunswick about lay analysis in Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1955
David Brunswick, factology in Ives Hendrick's discourse is incorrect, 1955
Brunswick asserts conformity on the part of LAPSI with the 1938 APA Resolution, 1955
Brunswick, Milton Wexler is a lecturer, not a training analyst, 1955
Brunswick, the status of analyst in LAPSI does not contradict the 1938 APA clause, 1955
Brunswick, we have no difficulties, but only those that are stirred from outside, 1955
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.27, A letter from Dr. Brunswick to Dr. Gitelson, President-Elect, APA, relative to laymen in Psychoanalysis, January 21, 1955
Creator,
Dr. David Brunswick, scholar, psychoanalyst, psychiatrist (1930s -- 1960s)
Subjects,
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Maxwell Gitelson, APA, 1955
A letter from Dr. Brunswick to Dr. Gitelson, APA, 1955
Dr. Brunswick informs Dr. Gitelson, President-Elect of APA about his letter to Hendrick, APA, 1955
Maxwell Gitelson supports LAPSI against accusation of Hendrick, 1955
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.28, A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz, relative to laymen on the faculty, January 24, 1955
Creator,
Dr. Ernst Lewy, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, scholar (1944 -- 1963)
Subjects,
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Henry Katz, 1950s
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz relative to Dr. Brunswick letter to Hendrick, January 1955
Ernst Lewy informs Henry Katz about the discourse initiated by Hendrick, APA, 1955
Henry Katz, psychoanalyst, Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Institute, 1950s, 1960s
Dr. Ernst Lewy, Director of the Institute and the Dean of the Training School, 1948 and later
Documents of Dr. Ernst Lewy in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.29, A letter from Dr. Gitelson, President-Elect to Dr. Brunswick, support, January 24, 1955
Creator,
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst
Subjects,
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Maxwell Gitelson, APA, 1955
A letter from Maxwell Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 24, 1955
Discourse of lay analysis in LAPSI, reflections on Ives Hendrick accusations, 1955
Maxwell Gitelson supports LAPSI against accusation of Hendrick, 1955
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst, APA
Documents of Dr. Gitelson in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.30, A letter from David Brunswick to Emanuel Windholz, an alert with regard to the correspondence with Hendrick, APA, January 24, 1955
Creator,
Dr. David Brunswick, scholar, psychoanalyst, psychiatrist (1930s -- 1960s)
Subjects,
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Emanuel Windholz, 1955
A letter from David Brunswick to Emanuel Windholz, reflections on the Hendrick's discourse, 1955
David Brunswick, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1950s
Dr. Emanuel Windholz, psychoanalyst
Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.31, A letter to David Brunswick from Maxwell Gitelson, APA, relative to the Hendrick’s discourse, January 25, 1955
Creator,
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst (1902 -- 1965)
Subjects,
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Maxwell Gitelson, APA, 1955
A letter from Dr. Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 25, 1955
Dr. Gitelson advises David Brunswick to circularize his response to Hendrick, discourse, 1955
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst, APA
David Brunswick, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1950s
Discourse of lay analysis in LAPSI, reflections on Ives Hendrick accusations, 1955
Documents of Dr. Gitelson in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.32, A letter from Windholz to Brunswick, support of the Brunswick response, January 31, 1955
Creator,
Emanuel Windholz, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst (1903 -- 1986)
Subjects,
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Emanuel Windholz, 1955
A letter from Emanuel Windholz to David Brunswick, January 31, 1955
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Emanuel Windholz, support of Dr. Brunswick's response to Dr. Hendrick, discourse, 1955
Documents of Dr. Emanuel Windholz in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.33, Notification of mailing out the Hendrick correspondence of lay analysis in LAPSI, 1955
Creator,
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst (1902 -- 1965)
Subjects,
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955
Correspondences related to the question of lay analysis in LAPSI, 1955
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.34 A letter to Dr. Hendrick, President, American Psychoanalytic Association from Arthur Noyes, President of American Psychiatric Association, lay analysis, December 1954, 1954
Creator,
Arthur Noyes, President of American Psychiatric Association
Subjects,
Correspondence between Arthur Noyes and Ives Hendrick, lay analysis, 1954
A letter from Arthur Noyes to Ives Hendrick, lay analysis, December 16, 1954
Arthur Noyes, concern of the lay analysis in LAPSI, December 1954
Arthur Noyes and Ives Hendrick, concerns about lay analysis in LAPSI, discourse, 1955
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Lay analysis is seen as disadvantage to medical profession in America, continuous controversies
Documents of Arthur Noyes in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Ives Hendrick in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.35, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Tax exemption, Articles of Incorporation, 1947
Creator,
State of California, Office of Secretary of State
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, documents of establishment, 1947
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, State of California, Tax exemption. 1947
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Articles of Incorporation, 1947
Ernst Lewy, founding member, notarized document, 1947
David Brunswick, founding member, notarized document, 1947
May Room, founding member, notarized document, 1947
Ernst Simmel, founding member, notarized document, 1947
History of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1947
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.36, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Corporate Classification, 1980
Creator,
State of California, Office of Secretary of State (1947)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, corporate classification, 1980
LAPSI, Public benefit institution, corporate classification, 1980
LAPSI, The New Corporate Code allows to hold, manage real property, 1980
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.37, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, certifications of amendments, 19461, 1967
Creator,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (1950s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, notarized amendments, 1961, 1967
The name of this corporation is Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, 1967
Maimon Leavitt, President of LAPSI, certification of amendment, 1967
Arthur Qurieff, Secretary of LAPSI, certification of amendment, 1967
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, LAPSI, History of the organization
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.38, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, report on general activity, 1946, 1947
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, report, 1946, 1947
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Committee on Incorporation, 1947
Composition of the Committee on Incorporation, 1947
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, LAPSI, History of the organization
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.39, Reply from Hendrick to Brunswick relative to the Brunswick letter, lay analysis in LAPSI, February 22, 1955
Creator,
Ives Hendrick, President of APA, co-founder of Boston Psychoanalytic Society (1898 -- 1972)
Subjects,
Correspondence between Ives Hendrick and David Brunswick, 1955
A letter from Ives Hendrick to David Brunswick, lay analysis, February 22, 1955
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Ives Hendrick response with regard to David Brunswick clarification of lay analysis, February 1955
Ives Hendrick, discourse on the lay analysis in LAPSI, 1955
Ives Hendrick, semantics of the meaning for psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, a letter to Brunswick
Ives Hendrick, psychoanalysis is a best method of psychotherapy, in a letter to Brunswick, 1955
Ives Hendrick prefers to refuse appointment of Milton Wexler for being a lay analyst, 1955
Documents of Ives Hendrick in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.40, Provisions for prospective analysts, Society and Institute, Teaching courses, Studies in Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, ca 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (1950s)
Subjects,
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
Society-Institute, LAPSI, Provision for personal analysis for candidates, 1959, 1960
Provisions for selecting training analysts, LAPSI, 1959, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, officers, 1959, 1960s
David Brunswick, Director, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Jack Vatz, Assistant Director, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Samuel Sperling, Secretary, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Albert Held, Treasure, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Ralph Greenson, Dean of Training School, LA Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Herbert Kupper, Assistant Dean of Training School, LA Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Henry Lihn, Director, Psychoanalytic Clinic, LA Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Milton Wexler, Director, Research Division, LA Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Ermalene Yerkes, Executive Secretary, LA Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1960s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1960s
Composition of the Education Committee, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Curriculum Committee, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Faculty Committee, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Committee on Child Analysis, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Research Committee, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Library Committee, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Candidates Committee, composition, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Lectures and Seminars, discourse, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Requirements for Graduation, ca 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Courses of Studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Psychoanalytic Theory of Instincts, course of study, ca 1959
LAPSI, General Theory of Neuroses, course of study, ca 1959
LAPSI, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, part I, course of study, ca 1959
LAPSI, Hysteria and Phobias, course of study, ca 1959
LASPSI, Introduction to Ego Psychology, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Obsessive - Compulsive Neuroses, course of study, ca 1959
LAPSI, Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Child Psychoanalysis, specialized (elective), course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Character Disorders, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, part II, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Clinical Conference, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Metapsychology (Introduction), course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Technique of Dream Interpretation, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Neurotic and Psychotic Depressions, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Clinical Conference: Dream Presentations, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Clinical Conference: Continuous Case, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Ego Psychology, Advanced, course of studies, ca 1959
Schizophrenia, Paranoid States and Allied Disorders, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Perversions and Impulses Neuroses, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Controversial Concepts, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Psychoanalytic Metapsychology, advanced, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Psychosomatic Phenomena, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Technique of Psychoanalysis, advanced, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Selected Topics, course of studies, ca 1959
LAPSI, Child Analysis, General, course of studies, ca 1959
Theory and implication of Psychoanalysis
Theory of Psychoanalysis, narratives
Theory and discourse of the instincts or drives, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Physiology
LAPSI, Teaching Theory and Application of Psychoanalysis, curriculum, ca 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.41, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, April -June 1960
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1960s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, meetings, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, meeting, June 16, 1960
Dr. Minnick, advisable withdrawn by the Education Committee, April 16, 1960
Dr. Minnick accepted candidacy in the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine, July 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, June 2, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, May 19, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, May 12, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, April 7, 1960
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.42, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, January - April 1960
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1960s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, meetings, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, March 24, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, March 3, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, February 4, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, January 21, 1960
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, January 7, 1960
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.43, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, December 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, December 14, 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, meeting, December 10, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.44, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, November 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, November 5, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.45, A letter to Ives Hendrick, APA from Dr. Gitelson, APA against instigating a conflict of lays analysis, January 6, 1955
Creator,
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst (1902 -- 1965)
Subjects,
A letter from Dr. Gitelson to Ives Hendrick against a conflict of lay analysis, January 6, 1955
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Correspondence between Ives Hendrick and Dr. Gitelson against a conflict of lay analysis, 1955
Discourse of lay analysis in LAPSI, reflections on Ives Hendrick accusations, 1955
Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst, APA
Maxwell Gitelson, President-Elect, APA, 1955
Gitelson, we shall not interfere into transitional situation with lay analysis, discourse, 1955
Gitelson, we shall not attend to technicalities when our principal positions are secure, discourse
Gitelson, I see Dr. Noyes' communication as an intrusion in our matters, 1955
Gitelson, the APA promotes Psychoanalysis scientifically and in clinical practice, discourse, 1955
Gitelson, Psychoanalysis is not a sub-specialty of Psychiatry, discourse, 1955
Psychoanalysis, discourse
Theory and implication of Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, discourse
Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis, discourses and narratives
Gitelson, the role of Psychoanalysis versus Psychiatry, discourse, 1955
Documents of Dr. Gitelson in the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.46, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, September - October 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, October 8, 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, September 10, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.47, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, Education Committee meetings, April - May 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, May 7, 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, April 9, 1959
LAPSI stand on the formation of the Board of Professional Standards of APA, in opposition, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.48, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, June 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, June 4, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.49, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, February - March 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, March 5, 1959
Education Committee, uncertainty tor the formation of the Board of Professional Standards, APA, 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, February 5, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.50, LAPSI, Education Committee meeting, January 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings 1959
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, January 8, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.51, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, September - December 1958
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, 1958
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, December 11, 1958
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, November 6, 1958
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, October 2, 1958
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, September 11, 1958
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.52, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, July 1958
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee, 1950s
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meetings, 1958
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Education Committee meeting, July 31, 1958
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.53, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, Training School and Education Committee, June 1958 – June 1959
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Training School, 1950s
Annual report, Training School, LAPSI, 1958 -- 1959
Annual report, Education Committee, LAPSI, 1958 -- 1959
LAPSI, Training School, annual report, Admission Committee, 1958 -- 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.54, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report of the Directors, academic year 1965 – 1966
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report of the Directors, 1965 -- 1966
Dr. Ernst Lewy, achievements and contributions, LAPSI, 1966
Dr. Ernst Lewy, Director of the Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1947 - 1957
Dr. Ernst Lewy, Dean of the Training School, 1947 - 1953
Frances Deri retires from Education Committee and as a training analyst, 1966
Hilda Rollman-Branch, Director of Extension Division, 1965 - 1966
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.55, LAPSI, Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, General Organization Chart, ca 1966
Creator,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis (1946 -- 1990s)
Subjects,
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, General Organization Chart, ca 1966
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, General Organization Chart, ca 1966
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, structure of organization, ca 1966
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.56, LAPSI, Report of the Joint Committee on Mutual Problems of Society and Institute, September 15, 1966
Creator,
Committee on Mutual Problem of Society and Institute
Maimon Leavitt, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute
Subjects,
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, internal tensions and controversies, 1960s
Los Angeles Society and Institute, a search for resolution of tensions and controversies, 1960s
LAPSI, a committee on mutual problems of Society and Institute is established, 1964
Committee on Mutual Problem of Society and Institute, seeking normalization, 1960s
Maimon Leavitt, Report, Committee on Mutual Problems of Institute and Society, September 15, 1966
Maimon Leavitt, history of the Committee on Mutual Problem of Institute-Society, 1964 -- 1966
Self-perpetuating function of Education Committee in running the Training School, a problem
The broad problems of an infant science come upon premature middle-age, Committee on Mutual Problems
Committee on Mutual Problem, we need a single organization with delineated subdivisions, 1966
Committee on Mutual Problems for the Society-Institute, revision of the By-Laws, 1966
History of Los Angeles Society-Institute, LAPSI, 1950s-1990s
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
RG-30.57, LAPSI, Proposed By-Laws for the Society-Institute, Commit
Creator,
Committee on Mutual Problem of Society and Instit
Dr. Vladimir Melamed, Historian, Professor of Ethno-Political and Ethno-National Studies, specializes on the interwar history of Poland and Eastern Europe.
Sphere of interests: Philosophy, History, Psychoanalysis
A draft of the Gentleman's agreement for the Split, February 13, 1950
Agreement between LAPSI and Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S.CA, March 1950
Albert Kandelin, an inquiry of psychoanalytic history in San Francisco, 1966
Albert Kandelin, Ernst Lewy's files for the Split discourse, 1949 - 1950
Albert Kandelin, History of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1970
Albert Kandelin, Laymen in California, an essay, 1960s
Albert Kandelin, Memorandum pertaining to the Split, May 15, 1962
Albert Kandelin, notes and reflections on the Split, ca 1960
Albert Kandelin, prospective work on Analytic History, History Committee, 1966
Albert Kandelin, provisional state of historical documents, report, June 1966
Albert Kandelin, three years of works of the History Committee, report, June 1966
A letter from David Brunswick to Emanuel Windholz,reflections on the Hendrick's discourse, 1955
A letter from Dr. Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben, in German, July 31, 1949
A letter from Dr. Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 25, 1955
A letter from Dr. Robert Knight to Ernst Lewy, June 11, 1948
A letter from Dr. Romm to Robert Knight, split discourse, April 12, 1950
A letter from Emanuel Windholz to David Brunswick, January 31, 1955
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Albert Kandelin, April 28, 1963
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben, the Split discourse, March 7, 1950
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben in German, July 10, 1949
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Grete Ruben in German, November 17, 1949
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz, February 13, 1950
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Henry Katz relative to Dr. Brunswick letter to Hendrick, January 1955
A Letter from Ernst Lewy to Paul Holmer, discourse, October 19, 1953
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Fliess, March 11, 1950
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Knight, January 5, 1946
A letter from Ernst Lewy to Robert Knight, June 4, 1948
A letter from Grete Ruben to Ernst Lewy, August 27, 1949
A letter from Grete Ruben to Ernst Lewy, July 16, 1949
A letter from Henry Katz to Ernst Lewy, January 23, 1950
A letter from LeRoy Maeder to Ernst Simmel, April 13, 1950
A Letter from Martin Grotjahn to Ernst Lewy, December 1950
A letter from Maxwell Gitelson to David Brunswick, January 24, 1955
A letter from Robert Knight, APA to Ernst Lewy, split discourse, March 31, 1950
A letter from Robert Knight to Ernst Lewy, January 27, 1948
A letter from Robert Knight to Romm related with her distortion of the facts of the Split, 1950
A letter from Robert Morse to Dr. Romm, split discourse, April 18, 1950
A letter from Sydney Biddle to Edward Bibring, January 4, 1950
A letter to Albert Kandelin from Emanuel Windholz, May 23, 1966
A memorandum from Ralph Greenson to Ernst Lewy, January 5, 1950
American Psychoanalytic Association, discussions and meetings
A note from Eugene Mindlin to Charles Tidd, February 20, 1950
Another institute, Grotjahn, Miller, Romm, the Split, February 1950
A provisional agreement for splitting up on two organizations, Split, 1950, Ernst Lewy
A question from Dr. Ernst Lewy why Dr. Norman Levy has been appointed a training analyst May 1950
A resignation discourse with regard to descenders from LAPSI, 1950s
Articles of Incorporation of the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S. California, March 1950
Board of Professional Standards regarding Institute of Psychoanalytic Medicine, Long Island, 1950
Board on Professional Standards, APA, recommendations on the splits of psychoanalytic institutions
Carel van der Heide, LAPSI, Dean of Training School, 1953, 1954
Collection of documents of the Simmel Family, in German, Albert Kandelin, 1966
Composition of the first psychoanalytic group in Los Angeles in the 1930s, History
Controversies in the function of the Education Committee, discourse of the Split, 1950
Controversies of lay analysis, discourse
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Emanuel Windholz, 1955
Correspondence between David Brunswick and Maxwell Gitelson, APA, 1955
Correspondence between Ernest Lewy and Martin Grotjahn, 1950s
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Emanuel Windholz, 1950s
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Grete Ruben, 1949, 1950
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Henry Katz, 1950s
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Ralph Greenson, 1950s
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Robert Fliess
Correspondence between Ernst Lewy and Robert Knight, 1940s, 1950s
Correspondence between Menninger and Simmel with regard to lay analysis, 1940, History, Kandelin
Correspondence between Sydney Biddle and Edward Bibring, 1950s
Correspondences between Albert Kandelin and Emanuel Windholz, 1960s
Correspondences between Ernest Lewy and Albert Kandelin, 1960s
Correspondences between LAPSI and S.CA Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine, 1950s
Correspondences related to the question of lay analysis in LAPSI, 1955
Creation of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Institute, its relation to the Society, 1949
David Brunswick, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
David Brunswick, President of Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1950s
David Brunswick, to his sins of omission, a meeting of July 7, 1947, Simmel deposed
David Brunswick, uncanny memories, vexation and reckoning, the meeting of July 7, 1947
Discourse of lay analysis in LAPSI, reflections on Ives Hendrick accusations, 1955
Discourse of psychoanalytic principles and provisions, Ernst Lewy, ca 1947
Discourse of the lay analysis in Los Angeles Society-Institute by the APA, 1955
Discourse of the Split, 1950
Discourse of the Split in Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949
Discourse of the Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949
Dissension in Retrospect (the Split), Kandelin, February 1963
Division of funds between the LAPSI and S.CA Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine, 1950
Document of Martin Grotjahn in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. David Brunswick
Documents from the NCP Archive, Dr. Lawrence Friedman
Documents of American Psychoanalytic Association in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Edward Bibring in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Emanuel Windholz in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Ernst Lewy in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. GHJ Pearson in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Henry Katz in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Robert Morse in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Dr. Romm in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Eugene Mindlin in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of LeRoy Maeder in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of London Institute of Psychoanalysis, Freudian, in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Milton Miller in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of Norman Levy in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents of the History Committee for the Society and Institute, 1960s
Documents of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society in the NCP-LA Archive
Documents related to the Split of the Psychoanalytic Institute of Los Angeles, 1950
Dr. Albert Kandelin, Chairman of the History Committee for the Psychoanalytic Society, Los Angeles
Dr. Albert Kandelin, History of Psychoanalytic Movement in Los Angeles
Dr. Albert Kandelin, narratives, collection of historical materials, Psychoanalytic Society, 1960s
Dr. David Brunswick, Split related discourses and recollections, 1960s
Dr. Emanuel Windholz, psychoanalyst
Dr. Ernest Simmel, narratives, Schloss Tegel
Dr. Ernst Lewy, devised a plan to preserve the unity of the Institute
Dr. Ernst Lewy, Director of the Institute and the Dean of the Training School, 1948 and later
Dr. Ernst Lewy, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
Dr. Ernst Lewy, efforts to preserve the Society and Institute undivided, January 3, 1950
Dr. Ernst Lewy, history of the split, ca 1960
Dr. Ernst Lewy, list of materials related to the Split of March 1950
Dr. Ernst Lewy, narratives
Dr. Gitelson advises David Brunswick to circularize his response to Hendrick, discourse, 1955
Dr. Henry Katz, a controversy between a deep psychology and simplification of the unconscious, 1949
Dr. Henry Katz, causes of the split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949
Dr. Henry Katz, division in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse, 1949
Dr. Henry Katz, emphasis on deep psychology in the study of unconscious, 1950
Dr. Henry Katz, Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1949, discourse
Dr. May Romm, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, architect of the Split
Dr. Romm, distortion of the facts caused the Split, April 12, 1950
Early History of Psychoanalytic movement in Los Angeles
Education committee meeting, confrontation between traditionalists and cessationists, February 1950
Education committee meeting, Ernst Lewy is a proponent of a London plan, February 2, 1950
Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, I feel that the London plan is not acceptable, 1950
Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, one group versus another group, February 2, 1950
Education committee meeting, Milton Miller, there has to be a complete split, February 2, 1950
Education committee meeting, Tidd, Can we work together, February 2, 1950
Emanuel Windholz, support of Dr. Brunswick's response to Dr. Hendrick, discourse, 1955
Ernest Lewy, Seminar for movie-writers, in the letter to Kandelin, 1962
Ernst Lewy, a question of lay analysis was a secondary matter in the Split, in the letter to Ruben
Ernst Lewy, Confidential memorandum of the London Plan, July 27, 1949
Ernst Lewy, content of the London Plan of re-organization, July 1949
Ernst Lewy, hardship and difficulties to bring Maria's son to America, 1950
Ernst Lewy, how difficult to expedite immigration of his wife Maria son from Germany to America
Ernst Lewy, LAPSI, Director, 1953 - 1954
Ernst Lewy, Memorandum, split discourse, ca June 1950
Ernst Lewy, need for split, personal differences, January 1950
Ernst Lewy, need for split, scientific differences, January 1950
Ernst Lewy, notes on the re-organization plan, January 15, 1950
Ernst Lewy, notification for the American Psychoanalytic Association of the Split, March 24, 1950
Ernst Lewy, Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, predating the Split, June 1962
Ernst Lewy, Re-organization London Plan, 1949
Ernst Lewy, reference to the February 2, 1950 pre-Split meeting, in the letter to Grete Ruben, 1950
Ernst Lewy, reflection on the state of psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1946 --1950, notes
Ernst Lewy, reflections on the history of Psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1930s - 1940s, discourse
Ernst Lewy, reflections on the state of psychoanalysis in Los Angeles, 1946
Ernst Lewy, reorganization plan for the Institute, January 1950, in the letter to Grete Ruben, 1950
Ernst Lewy, scientific works
Ernst Lewy, Tentative proposal for Future Regulation of Psychoanalytic Training, ca 1950
Ernst Lewy, the Split discourse, in the letter to Grete Ruben, March 7, 1950
Ernst Lewy, the state of affairs in Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1948
Ernst Lewy, to the Split, the division within the Institute existed for a long time, February 1950
Ernst Lewy and his wife Maria visited Germany in October of 1949, Maria saw her son
Ernst Lewy informs Henry Katz about the discourse initiated by Hendrick, APA, 1955
Ernst Lewy on the Split, confrontation with recent advancists, in a letter to Fliess, March 11, 1950
Ernst Simmel held a central position with regard to lay analysts, 1930s, Albert Kandelin, History
Ernst Simmel was the first physician analyst settled in Los Angeles in mid - 1930s, History
Etiology of the Split, analysis, 1950
Financial dealings between the two institutes, January 11, 1951
Forerunners of the Split, Recollections of Dr. Brunswick, May 1962
Frances Deri, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Funds paid to the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine by LAPSI, January 1951
Greenson, Evans, Newhouse, Rahman, Ruth Jaeger, the Old Guard, against Split, 1950
Greenson, impede appointment of training analysts, acceptance of applicants, approval of candidates
Greenson, we will not vouch for any training analysts that they could appoint, split discourse, 1950
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, Director, Extension Division, 1953, 1954
Hanna Fenichel, LAPSI, training analyst, 1953, 1954
Henry Katz, psychoanalyst, Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Institute, 1950s, 1960s
History Committee, begins to collect and narrate the documented history, 1964
History of Psychoanalysis in California, Albert Kandelin
History of the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse by Sydney Biddle, 1950
History of the Psychoanalytic Institute of Los Angeles after the Split, under May Romm guidance
Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicince of S. California, the purpose of corporation, March 1950
Kupper, Tidd, McGuire, Deri, Hanna Fenichel, Brunswick, the Old Guard, against Split, 1950
LAPSI, Articles of Incorporation, written consent of the membership to the Amendment, February 1959
LAPSI, A teaching and training programs, 1950s
LAPSI, By-Laws, Article I, Members, ca 1960
LAPSI, By-Laws, Article II, Dues and Fees, ca 1960
LAPSI, By-Laws, Article III, Admission to membership, ca 1960
LAPSI, By-Laws, Article V, Membership meetings, ca 1960
LAPSI, Curriculum and Bibliography, Spring 1952
LAPSI, Curriculum committee, composition, 1959
LAPSI, documents from the NCP-LA Archive
LAPSI, Elected officers and committees, By-Laws, December 1966
LAPSI, Faculty committee, composition, 1959
LAPSI, Fees and training grants, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, first year course, Child Psychoanalysis, Specialized (elective), 1959
LAPSI, first year course, Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique, 1959
LAPSI, first year course, General Theory of Neuroses, 1959
LAPSI, first year course, Hysteria and Phobias, 1959
LAPSI, first year course, Introduction to Ego Psychology, 1959
LAPSI, first year course, Obsessive-Compulsive Neuroses, 1959
LAPSI, first year course, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, 1959
LAPSI, Four-year courses of studies, description and literature, July 15, 1959
LAPSI, fourth year course, Child analysis, General, 1959
LAPSI, Lectures and seminars, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, lectures and seminars for analysts in training, 1959
LAPSI, Library Committee, composition, 1959
LAPSI, Personal analysis, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, Private practice of students, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, Psychiatric experience, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, Research Committee, composition, 1959
LAPSI, second year course, Clinical conference, Problem of Analyzability, 1959
LAPSI, second year course, Neurotic and Psychotic Depression, 1959
LAPSI, second year course, Structure, Function and Meaning of the Dream, (II), 1959
LAPSI, second year course, Technique of Dream Interpretation, 1959
LAPSI, Selection of students, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, Selection of training analysts, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, Study, Teaching and Advancing of Psychoanalysis, By-Laws, December 1966
LAPSI, Supervision of clinical work, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, the personal analysis, discourse, 1959
LAPSI, third year course, Controversial concepts, 1959
LAPSI, third year course, Perversions, and Impulse Neuroses, 1959
LAPSI, third year course, Schizophrenia, Paranoid and allied disorders, 1959
LAPSI, Training in child analysis, training provisions, 1950s
LAPSI, training provisions and regulations, 1950s
LAPSI, Training School, the stages of training, 1958
LAPSI, Training School, General Principles, 1958
Lawrence Friedman, his vision of the Split, March 1, 1950
Lewy, division in the Institute is due scientific differences and personal factors, Split, 1950
Lewy, Education Committee meeting, hostility and frictions, February 2, 1950
Lewy, Education Committee meeting, re-organization plan, February 2, 1950
Lincoln Rahman, LAPSI, Director, Psychoanalytic Clinic, 1953, 1954
London Institute of Psychoanalysis
London Institute of Psychoanalysis, Freudian conceptions
London Institute of Psychoanalysis, lectures and courses, the summer term, 1949
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, Annual Report, 1953 -- 1954
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, annual reports
Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalysis, LAPSI, Articles of Incorporation, 1959
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, 1946
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society, Membership roster, October 13, 1958
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, business meeting, agenda, September 22, 1966
Los Angeles Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, LAPSI, History of the organization
Los Angeles Society and Institute, a search for resolution of tensions and controversies, 1960s
Los Angeles Society and Institute, revised By-Laws, Membership, June 1966
Los Angeles Society and Institute, the Old Guard, 1950
Los Angeles Society and Institute, the revised By-Laws, Committee of Mutual Problems, June 1966
LSPSI, first year, Psychoanalytic theory of Instincts, 1959
Maria, wife of Ernst Lewy, met her son in German after ten years of separation, letter to Ruben
Maxwell Gitelson, scholar, psychoanalyst, APA
Maxwell Gitelson supports LAPSI against accusation of Hendrick, 1955
Meeting at Ernst Lewy home, preparation for the Split, minutes, February 25, 1950
Meeting at the Ernst Lewy house, discussion of the present split discourse, April 15, 1950
Members of the first psychoanalytic group in Los Angeles, 1930s, History of Psychoanalysis
Memorandum presented to Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society by Dr. GHJ Pearson, November 4, 1949
Menninger and Simmel, variance in perception of lay analysts, in correspondence, 1940, History
My passivity about evolving implementation of the Split, Dr. Brunswick
Notes of the meeting at Ernst Lewy's house, split discourse, April 15, 1950
Not to facilitate the further recognition of the other institute, the Lewy's group decision, 1950
Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, controversies with regard to training methodology, Biddle
Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, History
Pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 2, 1950
Pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 13, 1950
Proposed By-Laws, LAPSI, December 15, 1966
Proposed By-Laws of the Institute and Society, LAPSI, 1960s
Provisions for the imminent division of the Society and Institute, February 13, 1950
Psychoanalysis, discourse and conceptions
Ralph Greenson, Memorandum, the new institute, May 11, 1950
Report of the History Committee, Albert Kandelin, June 16, 1964
Resignation expected from the former members of LAPSI who descended, Lewy, December 15, 1950
Romm, Split, confrontational position, 1950
San Francisco Psychoanalytic Society, 1942
Sanitarium Schloss Tegel Inc., Psychiatric Hospital, 1927
Southern California Psychiatric Society, history, Kandelin, 1970
Split in the Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, discourse by Sydney Biddle, 1950
Statement of Lawrence Friedman, discourse, March 1, 1950
Structure of the Institute and Society, July 15, 1959
Substantiation for the establishment of two institutes, February 1950
Sydney Biddle with regard to the Split in Philadelphia Psychoanalytic Society, 1950
Teaching of Psychoanalysis, London Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1949
Tensions in the Society and Institute, 1940s, 1950s
The Candidate Committee, Psychoanalytic Institute, 1950
The course of the pre-Split Education Committee meeting, February 2, 1950
The first nine directors of the Institute for Psychoanalytic Medicine of S. California, March 1950
The formation of a separate institute was inevitable, 1950
The present Institute, Brunswick, Lewy, Deri, Greenson, Tidd, the Split, February 1950
The role of laymen in establishing of psychoanalytic institutions in California, early history
The Split on two psychoanalytic institutes, 1950
The view of the Freudian training analysts, Education Committee and the Institute, March 1950
Three members of the Education Committee will apply to form another psychoanalytic institute, Split
Ties between the two institutes, Martin Grotjahn in the letter to Ernest Lewy, 1950
Variants of actions with regard to the approval of the other institute, the Lewy's group, 1950
Walter Briehl, Exploratory Committee, 1949
Working on the content and phraseology of the imminent division, the Split, February 1950
Works of History Committee, presentations, 1960s
